Skip to McMaster Navigation Skip to Site Navigation Skip to main content
McMaster logo

Data Blitz & Poster Presentations

Data Blitz

Friday, July 12th, 2024 at 10:30-11:00am EST
Presentations will be delivered in person in MDCL 1105 and also streamed for the online audience.

You can also find them at their posters during the lunch break!

"Exploring the Potential of Immersive Technology in the Enhancement of Anatomy Education" presented by Katelyn Wood

Katelyn Wood, Paul Mensink, Sean McWatt
The University of Western Ontario

Anatomy education, by nature, can be difficult for students to learn and understand, highlighting the need for advanced teaching methods and a commitment to improve students’ capacity for learning. The gold standard for anatomy education is cadaveric dissection and/or pro-section. However, cadavers are not readily available in all departments. The Faculty of Health Sciences at Western University does not have access to cadavers for student learning, so anatomy has traditionally been taught using 2D images, including textbooks and lecture slides, as well as 3D plastinated models. However, these can be unrealistic, degrade over time, and require a significant amount of intrinsic student motivation to learn. Our study explores the use of digital tools for anatomy education. This innovation holds significant promise for enhancing undergraduate education in anatomy. Our study aims to explore the benefits of using digital tools alongside traditional teaching methods.

"Beyond the Screen: Examining knowledge transfer between virtual and physical learning and testing modalities" presented by Linda Wu

Linda Wu, Rabbea Sidhu, Malak Aiad, Sorin Darie, Nyssa Rousta, Alex Cen, Ryan Phan, Jessica Gu, Josh P. Mitchell, Bruce Wainman, Danielle Brewer-Deluce
McMaster University

Virtual reality (VR) gained interest in anatomy education, yet it remains unclear if knowledge acquired in VR transfers to physical (PH) testing environments. Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP) suggests test performance is enhanced when learning and testing environments match. This study investigates the transferability of anatomical knowledge acquired in VR or PH environments to both testing environments. A cohort of 154 participants without anatomical knowledge was randomized into VR or PH groups. Both groups completed a pre-test, a learning phase, and two post-tests (one in VR and one in PH) in randomized order to measure knowledge transfer between modalities. Preliminary analysis of 89 participants showed an 8% decrease in post-test scores when learning in VR and testing in PH. VR-acquired knowledge transfers to VR tests but not to PH tests, while PH-acquired knowledge transfers effectively to both testing environments. Therefore, VR is a viable testing modality but should not replace PH learning.

"Testing boosts knowledge integration during learning" presented by Samantha Gauvreau

Samantha Gauvreau & Karl Szpunar
Toronto Metropolitan University

Interpolated testing, which involves interspersing extended sequences of study with opportunities to retrieve information, is posited to promote learning via the integration of knowledge across the study sequence. In the present study, learners studied 3 lists of words in anticipation of two final cumulative recall tests. After each list, learners either recalled the list (tested condition), restudied the list (restudy condition), or completed an unrelated math distractor task (control condition). For the first cumulative recall test, testing and restudy resulted in higher recall than the control condition. However, testing was differentiated from both restudy and control by higher semantic organization. Notably, whereas overall recall did not improve across the two cumulative recall tests, all participants showed organizational improvements during their second cumulative recall test indicating that exposure to testing may optimize learning by promoting meaningful connections between related concepts across separate segments of study.

"Learning without conscious effort: using questions to proactively tap into fringe and non-conscious stages of the creative process" presented by Ian Lumb

Ian Lumb
York University

“Create” occupies the apex of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Thus, Bloom’s revised framework acknowledges generating, planning, and producing as the ultimate demonstration of mastery in the learning process. Although only one of the six levels of cognitive processing, creativity has the most innate potential to contribute to learning. By codifying the four stages into preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification, Wallas incorporated the role of consciousness into the creative process almost a century ago. Non-major, first-year undergraduate students in geoscience courses were required to capture questions while engaging in self-guided field work. By self-reporting context, a crude means for estimating their conscious engagement became available. Findings here indicate the occurrence of questions when students were not consciously engaged in their coursework. Thus, well-established techniques from knowledge graphs are being applied to better quantify relationships latent in the data. The approach may surface indirect evidence for non-conscious cognitive processing during the learning process.

"Cognition in lectures and daily life: linking engagement, thought features, and academic success" presented by Silvia Shiwei Zhou

Silvia Shiwei Zhou, Jonathan Smallwood, & Jeffrey D. Wammes
Queen’s University

Attentional states are critical in dictating effective learning. Yet, beyond on- versus off-task states, the role of nuanced thought features (e.g., valence, modality, self) remains unclear, despite that not all forms of off-task thoughts hinder learning. In this work, using multidimensional experience sampling, we densely sampled students’ thought patterns via thought probes at the beginning and end of a semester, both in class and across various contexts in daily life. Throughout each class, we also periodically probed students’ engagement level. To assess learning outcomes, we retrieved students’ grades on all assessments. We found that in-class engagement is linked to more ‘detailed deliberate’, and less ‘positive intrusive’ thoughts. Among in-lecture ratings, ‘detailed deliberate’ thinking predicted better lab grades, but engagement did not. Notably, higher- relative to lower-performing students reported thought patterns while doing homework that more closely resembled their thoughts during lectures, highlighting the importance of daily cognition in academic success.

Posters

1 - Exploring the Potential of Immersive Technology in the Enhancement of Anatomy Education

Katelyn Wood, Paul Mensink, Sean McWatt
The University of Western Ontario

2 - Beyond the Screen: Examining knowledge transfer between virtual and physical learning and testing modalities

Linda Wu, Rabbea Sidhu, Malak Aiad, Sorin Darie, Nyssa Rousta, Alex Cen, Ryan Phan, Jessica Gu, Josh P. Mitchell, Bruce Wainman, Danielle Brewer-Deluce
McMaster University

3 - Testing boosts knowledge integration during learning

Samantha Gauvreau & Karl Szpunar
Toronto Metropolitan University

4 - Learning without conscious effort: using questions to proactively tap into fringe and non-conscious stages of the creative process

Ian Lumb
York University

5 - Cognition in lectures and daily life: linking engagement, thought features, and academic success

Silvia Shiwei Zhou, Jonathan Smallwood, & Jeffrey D. Wammes
Queen’s University

6 - Living Learning Communities at McMaster – Impacts on the First-Year Experience

Melissa Gallina, Monica Palkowski, Kristin Taylor, John Maclachlan
McMaster University

7 - Leveraging Digital Twins to Teach Troubleshooting and Problem Solving in Undergraduate Chemical Engineering

Frank Serafino, Saidas Ranade (Schneider Electric/AVEVA), Lucas Grosso (Schneider Electric/AVEVA), Thomas E. Marlin, Jake Nease
McMaster University

8 - Impact of Sleep and Preparedness on Academic Performance in Undergraduate Students

Hannah Bridgman, Joseph A. Kim, Michelle L. Cadieux
McMaster University

9 - Do Faculty Characteristics Predict Instructors’ Beliefs About Student Abilities?

Veronica Cui, Noor Butt, Megan Cerilli, Atara Lipetz, Elizabeth Canning, Faria Sana, & Joseph A. Kim
McMaster University

10 - Question Creation – An extension of the Generation Effect

Mrinalini Sharma, Yutian Ma, Joseph Kim, Faria Sana
McMaster University

11 - The bigger, the better: learners prefer larger-than-life models in both physical and virtual reality

Alex Cen, Nyssa Rousta, Sorin Darie, Ryan Phan, Jessica Gu, Rabbea Sidhu, Malak Aiad, Linda Wu, Josh P. Mitchell, Bruce Wainman, Danielle Brewer-Deluce
McMaster University

12 - Filling the Gaps: Investigating metacognitive judgements when learning from virtual reality and 3D-printed models

Ryan Phan, Jessica Gu, Sorin Darie, Rabbea Sidhu, Alex Cen, Nyssa Rousta, Malak Aiad, Linda Wu, Josh P. Mitchell, Danielle Brewer-Deluce, Bruce C. Wainman
McMaster University

13 - The Power of Choice: Flexible Course Delivery and Assessment Schemes Improve Student Satisfaction and Support Their Success

Luca Bernardini, Miriam Goldstein, Zoya Adeel, Kate Brown, Lee de Bie Das, & Katie Moisse
McMaster University

14 - Can Personal Memories and Fictional Stories Enhance Retention of Novel Words?

Lina Deker and Thanujeni Pathman
York University

15 - Chem-FAST: The Chemistry Formative Assessment Study Tool

Bianca Berghea1, Kyle Carnrite2, Lauren Hicks3, Longxi Lin4, Travis Moore2, Jan Pöhls5, Benjamin Potter3, Ethan Schmidt1, Shuoyang Wang1, Yinxi Wang1, April Wei1, Sharonna Greenberg1
1Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, 2Department of Computing and Software, McMaster University, 3Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, 4Department of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 5Department of Chemistry, University of New Brunswick